<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Lewis Gersh Blog / Metamorphic Ventures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh</link>
	<description>Metamorphic Ventures is a New York City based venture capital fund that invests in start-up and early stage businesses exclusively in digital media and transaction processing technology sectors.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on FetchBack Exits to GSI Commerce by employment background check</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2010/06/01/fetchback-exits-to-gsi-commerce/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>employment background check</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 01:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=54#comment-61</guid>
		<description>
 I do like what you have done with the site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I do like what you have done with the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Encoding.com launches Vid.ly by Jeff Malkin</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/24/encoding-com-launches-vid-ly/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Malkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=72#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Thanks for believing in us Lewis, Marc and David.  Your contributions and support are greatly appreciated.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for believing in us Lewis, Marc and David.  Your contributions and support are greatly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Thanks Phil.  Hmmm, or maybe both things are happening concurrently, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Phil.  Hmmm, or maybe both things are happening concurrently, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Thanks, much appreciated and good to hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, much appreciated and good to hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scott, was wondering when i was drafting this how much it applied and with what time frames to other high tech innovation sectors.  Interesting to hear in film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scott, was wondering when i was drafting this how much it applied and with what time frames to other high tech innovation sectors.  Interesting to hear in film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Thanks Gene and very funny on Velocity of Obesity.  My cousin from West point told me that 3/4 of all high school grads are ineligible for the Army due to obesity.  That is a frightening statistic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gene and very funny on Velocity of Obesity.  My cousin from West point told me that 3/4 of all high school grads are ineligible for the Army due to obesity.  That is a frightening statistic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-51</guid>
		<description>I think an entrepreneurs greatest asset is also their greatest liability: The enthusiasm to will things into being which drives the venture forward, but also attracts opportunistic distractions.  But their ADD and/or innovation refinement is probably not to blame for the behind-the-times issue agencies face.  Mark Twain: &quot;When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it&#039;s always twenty years behind the times.&quot;  He could have swapped the city for &quot;client&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an entrepreneurs greatest asset is also their greatest liability: The enthusiasm to will things into being which drives the venture forward, but also attracts opportunistic distractions.  But their ADD and/or innovation refinement is probably not to blame for the behind-the-times issue agencies face.  Mark Twain: &#8220;When the end of the world comes, I want to be in Cincinnati because it&#8217;s always twenty years behind the times.&#8221;  He could have swapped the city for &#8220;client&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Well put.  I was focused only on the average of web enabled ventures, not the many of the best which often do run longer and then have the benefit of developing a defensible market share/brand awareness as the leader.  And faster than ever today like Groupon or Zynga.  And probably more so in consumer facing as well.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.  I was focused only on the average of web enabled ventures, not the many of the best which often do run longer and then have the benefit of developing a defensible market share/brand awareness as the leader.  And faster than ever today like Groupon or Zynga.  And probably more so in consumer facing as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by LewisGersh</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>LewisGersh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Great comments and agreed.  We are a backer of companies, not products, and no we do not incubate them (any more so than our portfolio companies all test and refine through the seed stage we fund).  And per your later point, one of the ramifications of greater capital efficiency is the &quot;noise in the system&quot; from so many entrants in a given sector.  While it doesn&#039;t cost as much time and capital as in Bubble 1.0, we do see too many entrants that are features, not even products, let alone companies, but mostly on the consumer facing side, less so on B2B where we are focused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments and agreed.  We are a backer of companies, not products, and no we do not incubate them (any more so than our portfolio companies all test and refine through the seed stage we fund).  And per your later point, one of the ramifications of greater capital efficiency is the &#8220;noise in the system&#8221; from so many entrants in a given sector.  While it doesn&#8217;t cost as much time and capital as in Bubble 1.0, we do see too many entrants that are features, not even products, let alone companies, but mostly on the consumer facing side, less so on B2B where we are focused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Velocity of Obsolescence by Thorsten Claus</title>
		<link>http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/2011/01/04/the-velocity-of-obsolescence/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorsten Claus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mv.vc/lewisgersh/?p=67#comment-46</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feeling about your observation, mainly because the borders between &#039;traditional&#039; VC investments, incubators, and holding companies are getting fuzzy. If your fund is focusing on helping to develop products, then the VoO is definitely accelerating. If your fund is rather for incubation of products, then your strategies will be significantly different from incubating companies. Sounds a little bit like Brickhouse for me. But it takes a different level to create a company, not only a product.

To my point: Tynt or Fetchback are more than products. Sure: I can create and copy scripts of Tynt and start my own analytics website, but that doesn&#039;t really cut it, right? (and it won&#039;t scale to 20b pages, 250m users, and countless B2B relationships and channels, either)

I agree with faster beta testing / more prototyping and accelerating opportunities for customer acquisition. But prototyping early and often leads to publicizing products or features instead of making companies public - hence the felt need for faster innovation (in the &#039;old times&#039; we first built the company, not &#039;just&#039; several beta products). I&#039;m sure there is a place for VCs that &#039;prototype&#039; often and early and their mechanics will be different, as the acquired customers may neither be paying nor sustainable. 

Which brings me to sustainability - or long-term positive effect on quality of life at a larger scale. Many services and apps are surely fun and entertaining, interesting and helpful. But do they move boxes? Do they help producing something? Do they make me healthier? Do they reduce carbon footprint? I&#039;m becoming increasingly weary of investment opportunities that are just &#039;nice&#039; - and there are really many of them. my Point: Because of lower (capital) market entrance barriers (thank you, Cloud) VCs can find more and increasingly smaller-sized early-stage opportunities, but not all of these opportunities make me excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feeling about your observation, mainly because the borders between &#8216;traditional&#8217; VC investments, incubators, and holding companies are getting fuzzy. If your fund is focusing on helping to develop products, then the VoO is definitely accelerating. If your fund is rather for incubation of products, then your strategies will be significantly different from incubating companies. Sounds a little bit like Brickhouse for me. But it takes a different level to create a company, not only a product.</p>
<p>To my point: Tynt or Fetchback are more than products. Sure: I can create and copy scripts of Tynt and start my own analytics website, but that doesn&#8217;t really cut it, right? (and it won&#8217;t scale to 20b pages, 250m users, and countless B2B relationships and channels, either)</p>
<p>I agree with faster beta testing / more prototyping and accelerating opportunities for customer acquisition. But prototyping early and often leads to publicizing products or features instead of making companies public &#8211; hence the felt need for faster innovation (in the &#8216;old times&#8217; we first built the company, not &#8216;just&#8217; several beta products). I&#8217;m sure there is a place for VCs that &#8216;prototype&#8217; often and early and their mechanics will be different, as the acquired customers may neither be paying nor sustainable. </p>
<p>Which brings me to sustainability &#8211; or long-term positive effect on quality of life at a larger scale. Many services and apps are surely fun and entertaining, interesting and helpful. But do they move boxes? Do they help producing something? Do they make me healthier? Do they reduce carbon footprint? I&#8217;m becoming increasingly weary of investment opportunities that are just &#8216;nice&#8217; &#8211; and there are really many of them. my Point: Because of lower (capital) market entrance barriers (thank you, Cloud) VCs can find more and increasingly smaller-sized early-stage opportunities, but not all of these opportunities make me excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

